New Publications in November

Posted on 10 December 2013 | No responses

Even though I’m no longer working at the university, November was an excellent month publication wise. Two conference papers written in the Spring were published at Koli Calling 2013 whereas a long journal paper process finally ended in a published paper in ACM Transactions in Computing Education.

The journal paper is titled “A Review of Generic Program Visualization Systems for Introductory Programming Education” (ACM, pdf) and was written with Juha Sorva and Lauri Malmi:

This article is a survey of program visualization systems intended for teaching beginners about the runtime behavior of computer programs. Our focus is on generic systems that are capable of illustrating many kinds of programs and behaviors. We inclusively describe such systems from the last three decades and review findings from their empirical evaluations. A comparable review on the topic does not previously exist; ours is intended to serve as a reference for the creators, evaluators, and users of educational program visualization systems. Moreover, we revisit the issue of learner engagement which has been identified as a potentially key factor in the success of educational software visualization and summarize what little is known about engagement in the context of the generic program visualization systems for beginners that we have reviewed; a proposed refinement of the frameworks previously used by computing education researchers to rank types of learner engagement is a side product of this effort. Overall, our review illustrates that program visualization systems for beginners are often short-lived research prototypes that support the user-controlled viewing of program animations; a recent trend is to support more engaging modes of user interaction. The results of evaluations largely support the use of program visualization in introductory programming education, but research to date is insufficient for drawing more nuanced conclusions with respect to learner engagement. On the basis of our review, we identify interesting questions to answer for future research in relation to themes such as engagement, the authenticity of learning tasks, cognitive load, and the integration of program visualization into introductory programming pedagogy.

First of the conference papers is “How to study programming on mobile touch devices: interactive Python code exercises” (ACM) written with Petri Ihantola and Juha Helminen:

Scaffolded learning tasks where programs are constructed from predefined code fragments by dragging and dropping them (i.e. Parsons problems) are well suited to mobile touch devices, but quite limited in their applicability. They do not adequately cater for different approaches to constructing a program. After studying solutions to automatically assessed programming exercises, we found out that many different solutions are composed of a relatively small set of mutually similar code lines. Thus, they can be constructed by using the drag-and-drop approach if only it was possible to edit some small parts of the predefined fragments. Based on this, we have designed and implemented a new exercise type for mobile devices that builds on Parsons problems and falls somewhere between their strict scaffolding and full-blown coding exercises. In these exercises, we can gradually fade the scaffolding and allow programs to be constructed more freely so as not to restrict thinking and limit creativity too much while still making sure we are able to deploy them to small-screen mobile devices. In addition to the new concept and the related implementation, we discuss other possibilities of how programming could be practiced on mobile devices.

Second Koli paper was written by the same trio and is titled “Recording and analyzing in-browser programming sessions” (ACM):

In this paper, we report on the analysis of a novel type of automatically recorded detailed programming session data collected on a university-level web programming course. We present a method and an implementation of collecting rich data on how students learning to program edit and execute code and explore its use in examining learners’ behavior. The data collection instrument is an in-browser Python programming environment that integrates an editor, an execution environment, and an interactive Python console and is used to deliver programming assignments with automatic feedback. Most importantly, the environment records learners’ interaction within it. We have implemented tools for viewing these traces and demonstrate their potential in learning about the programming processes of learners and of benefiting computing education research and the teaching of programming.

As soon as these become available in the ACM Author-Izer service, you’ll be able to download the PDFs from my publications page.

Leaving Academia and Aalto (at least for now)

Posted on 31 July 2013 | No responses

Today was my last day at Aalto University (formerly known as Helsinki University of Technology). I’ve worked there 11 years (and had at least as many fixed-term contracts).

Early this Spring, when it started to look like things might come to an end at Aalto, I started writing a blogpost nitpicking the pros and cons of academic work. Today, it all seems quite pointless and I want to focus on the big picture:

  • I’ve specified the projects I work on (mostly) myself.
  • I’ve constantly learned new technologies and skills.
  • I’ve traveled to interesting places (like Lisbon, Macau, Frankfurt, Canterbury, and Beijing in just the past five months).
  • I’ve worked with smart and motivated people.

That’s what matters in the end, and that’s why I’ve stayed in the same place for the past 11 years. So a big thank you to all the great people I’ve been allowed to work with! I’m sure I’ll see you someday somewhere!

 

PS. If you know of an interesting position at a university or a company, let me know :)

Quality Of WordPress Plug-Ins: An Overview of Security and User Ratings

Posted on 25 September 2012 | No responses

Three weeks ago, my colleague Petri presented our (that is, me, Petri, and Teemu who did most of the work) paper titled “Quality Of WordPress Plug-Ins: An Overview of Security and User Ratings” at Workshop on Security and Privacy in Social Networks. The main purpose of the paper was to analyze a set of WordPress plugins to find out if plugin ratings predict the number of potential security vulnerabilities in them.

In order to do that, we downloaded the source code and ratings and download counts of a set of random plugins (322 in total). We then ran the RIPS PHP security vulnerability scanner to find potential security holes in the code. The 322 plugins had:

  • 3,792,711 downloads
  • 2,783 user ratings
  • 179,393 lines of PHP code

Of the 322 plugins, 127 had a potential security vulnerability according to RIPS. In total, 860 vulnerabilities were identified.

When comparing this with the ratings of the plugins, we found only a small, negative correlation between the rating of the plugin and the number of potential vulnerabilities. To put it another way, plugin ratings are not a good measure of the security of the plugin.

There are, of course, several problems with our analysis and conclusion. Biggest of those is that the sample size was really small compared to the total number of plugins (over 21,000 at the moment). To improve the results, we are currently analyzing a bigger sample (100% of them, to be exact).

If you are interested in more details, the full paper can be downloaded here.

Event Handling for JSAV Data Structures

Posted on 20 May 2012 | No responses

For a while now, I’ve been meaning to start a series of articles on JSAV features. The current documentation only works as a reference to the API and does not explain or give enough examples. Also, it does not argue why things are done certain way and writing these things down makes me really think them through. As I recently implemented a support for easy attachment of event handlers to data structures, that seems like as good as any topic to start.

The Way Things Were

In general, attaching event handlers with jQuery is easy. That is, unless the HTML is generated by the library and there is no reason you should need to know the structure of it. Also, getting the JSAV object for the node/index matching the DOM element is tricky. The old way for doing this was something like:

// register a click event handler to all JSAV array indices
$(".jsavindex").click(function() {
  //find the index of the clicked item
  var index = $(this).parent().find(".jsavindex").index(this);
  // do something with the array
});

Events for the Array Indices

To ease this, a recent commit introduced a better way to attach events to arrays and trees. Both structures support following events: click, dblclick, mousedown, mousemove, mouseup, mouseenter, and mouseleave. While the names are reasonably self-explaining, you can check jQuery event documentation for details on the events.

For a JSAV array, there are functions with the same name as the events that can be used to register event handlers for that event type. So, for example, to add a function to be called whenever mouse enters an array index, you can do the following:

arr.mouseenter(function(index) {
  this.highlight(index);
};

The event handler function gets as the first parameter the index of the array element that the user interacted with. The this variable is set to point to the JSAV array. Naturally you don’t need to pass an anonymous function as the event handler, but you can use any function as the parameter. A good example of this are the JSAV array functions, most of which take an index as the first parameter. The API documentation gives the following example that illustrates this well:

arr.mouseenter(arr.highlight).mouseleave(arr.unhighlight);

This also shows that the event binding functions return the structure itself, so you can safely chain the function calls.

Another parameter the event handler gets is the jQuery event object. You can use that in case you need to, for example, stop the propagation of the event.

arr.dblclick(function(index, event) {
  event.stopPropagation();
  // ... do something else..
});

Note: most of the JSAV functions that change some properties of the structures also store the changes to the animation history. For events that are fired often (such as mousemove), the history can get really long quite fast. Thus, make sure you don’t misuse the events.

Events for Trees

For trees, there are functions for binding handlers for the same set of events: click, dblclick, mousedown, mousemove, mouseup, mouseenter, and mouseleave. These functions can be called for the JSAV tree instance. The actual event handlers will be bound to either nodes or edges of the tree.

Let’s begin with a simple example:

var tree = jsav.ds.tree();
// ...
tree.click(function(e) {
  this.highlight();
});

What this would do is bind the anonymous function to be called whenever a node in the tree is clicked. The event handler function gets as a parameter the jQuery event object. Inside the handler, this will refer to the node or edge that the event was triggered for.

Like I mentioned, the event handler will be bound to the nodes by default. My assumption here, based on our experience with TRAKLA2 assignments, is that this is the more common use case. But don’t worry, binding handlers for edges is almost as simple, you just need to add one option. Like this

tree.click(myEdgeClickHandler, { edge: true });

This will bind the function to only edges, and inside the handler, this will refer to the JSAV edge object triggering the event. If you want (although I can’t come up with a good use case), you can bind the handler to both by adding another option node with value true.

Custom Arguments

The above describes the basic usage of the implementation, but there are other ways to deal with even more complex requirements. First of, custom arguments can be passed to the event handler. For example, to change a CSS property of an array index on mouseenter and remove it on mouseleave, the code needed with the above functions is something like:

arr.mouseenter(function(index) {
  this.css(index, {"color": "red"});
}.mouseleave(function(index) {
  this.css(index, {"color": "black"});
});

To ease this, the event binding functions all take a second, optional, parameter to specify custom parameters for the handler. This parameter should be an array with as many items as you want to pass as arguments for the event handler. With custom arguments, the above example can be simplified to:

arr.mouseenter([{"color": "red"}], arr.css)
   .mouseleave([{"color": "black"}], arr.css);

So, it uses the array’s css function and passes the arguments for that function as parameter when registering the event handler. The function calls made by JSAV would be identical to the those made in the version not using custom arguments, except for the jQuery event object being the last argument. Ordering the parameters for the binding function to be event data first is just to be more consistent with jQuery.

Binding Custom Events

While writing this blog post, I realized there should probably be a way to bind custom events as well. While not required at the moment, I can already see a need to bind, for example, touch events. So, a later commit added on function to array and tree that allows binding any events. As the first parameter, the function takes the event name(s). The other required argument is again the event handler. For example

arr.on("touchstart", myEventHandler);

would register the function myEventHandler to be triggered when touchstart event is triggered.

Custom data for the handler can also be specified as the second parameter:

arr.on("touchstart", {myVal: "cat"}, myEventHandler);

And for trees, a last options parameter can be passed.

Summary

As a summary, here are the function signatures for the functions in array and tree:

arr.eventName([data,] handler);
arr.on(eventName, [data,] handler);
tree.eventName([data,] handler [, options]);
tree.on(eventName, [data,] handler [, options]);

What do you think? Any questions or suggestions on how to improve?

Our First Mobile App for Learning Python – Soon Ready

Posted on 14 February 2012 | No responses

Our company’s (ByTheMark, that is) first mobile application is getting closer to publishing. It is a quiz game for learning and testing Python programming knowledge. Name of the app is Quiz & Learn Python.

Logo of Quiz&Learn Python

The game asks questions ranging from simple concepts to more advanced tricks in Python programming.
Question in Quiz&Learn Python

The player has four lifelines at her disposal: remove two incorrect answers, skip the question, stop time and debug the program. The last one is what I think makes this game different from a typical quiz with questions about programming. Below is an image from the debugger.
Quiz&Learn Python Debugger

The game will be soon available for iPhone, other platforms possible later. You can test Quiz & Learn Python online. On the linked page, you can also register for our newsletter to be notified when the game is ready!

Books I Read in 2011

Posted on 3 January 2012 | No responses

A new year has started, so I wanted to look back on the books I read in 2011 (the idea actually came from this post by Tim Kadlec). Here is an almost complete list of the books somewhat related to web development or entrepreneurship. I’ve left out stuff I read for fun (like the Stieg Larsson’s Millennium Trilogy) as well as the ones I did not enjoy. These are the good books!

older posts »

VilleKaravirta.com is powered by WordPress. Copyright © VilleKaravirta.com. Hosting by the awesome WebFaction. Contact me by email ville@villekaravirta.com.